|
In “Time
the Operation” we looked at how to establish the basic time
of operations in seconds per piece. Toward
the end of that section we introduced “Operational
Allowances”, such
as regular stocking up of local work containers,
and also mentioned “Shift
Allowances”. The
use of shift allowances into the final calculation of the standard recognizes
that there are legitimate delays that can occur during the shift that can
stop people from working on the fabrication and assembly of products.
These allowances are usually established through delay studies.
DEVELOPMENT OF A
DELAY STUDY
The work standard for an operation should allow
time for various additional legitimate delays encountered during the
shift. Such items are called delay allowances. They have been classified
and definite rules are set for their inclusion in the standard.
The delay study provides the opportunity to identify the legitimate
allowances and also provides additional very useful information on the
general working of the operation during the shift
Before starting the study it is necessary to conduct similar checks to
that made before conducting an individual study. It is always a good idea
to get a feel for the types of delays that are likely to be encountered. A
list of typical delays can be established and a key applied to each delay.
This helps in summarizing the results at the completion of the study. Not
all delays will be identified before the study commences but it will help
if the majority of delays can be set up.
Typical rules to
decide what allowances can be included in the standard are as follows:-
Delay allowances should be included in the standard only if the delay is a
definite requirement of the job and can be expected to occur at least once
on every shift.
If the allowance is included in the standard then it cannot be charged out
to expense.
-
Tool
Changes and Adjustments - this is allowed if the operator has to
perform the task or has to wait at the work-station while the task is
completed. (Shift allowance)
-
Stock
handling - this is repetitive tasks, for example; handling steel coils, bars or containers etc. (Operational allowance)
-
Service
Equipment - this could include making minor machine adjustments,
and lubricating or changing coolant etc. (Shift allowance)
-
Job
Preparation & Cleanup - this could include arranging work
place, checking tooling and equipment, putting on protective clothing,
cleaning work place, washing up (health or safety measure), counting
parts produced or other clerical duties. (Shift allowance)
-
Gauging
& Inspection - this is periodic checking of the work produced
e.g. SPC. (Operational allowance)
-
Other
delays - Plant policy allowed delays.
-
Personal
- varies from plant to plant.
-
Tea
Break
- example 10 minutes per 8 hour shift.
To conduct a delay study it is necessary to record the total shift
and as in recording single operations it is advisable to use a continuous
running stopwatch. |
| Key |
Event |
Studied Continuous Time (mins) |
Studied Individual Time (mins) |
Allowable Individual Time (mins) |
Remarks |
| |
Start study |
6:00am |
|
|
|
| A |
Switch on machines |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
Shift allowance |
| D |
SPC |
4.50 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Operational allowance |
| B |
Run |
30.00 |
25.50 |
25.50 |
|
| D |
SPC |
35.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Shift allowance |
| B |
Run |
46.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
| C |
Stock parts |
48.50 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Operational allowance |
| J |
Discuss football |
49.50 |
1.00 |
XXX |
Not allowable |
| B |
Run |
60.00 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
| |
|
7:00am |
|
|
|
| D |
SPC |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Shift allowance |
| B |
Run |
23.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
|
|
Once the study has been completed it is necessary to summarize the
allowable delays and if they are classified as shift delays the
available run time would be 480 minutes – tea break – allowable
delays.
This calculation assumes that the shift duration is 8 hours.
SIMPLIFIED STUDY CALCULATION
For a rough-cut estimate of the standard it is not
necessary to conduct a full time study. A number of methods have been
developed including PMTS (Predetermined Method-Time System), to establish an
estimated standard. This system details times for many individual
movements of fingers, hand, arm, body bend, body twist, and eye movements
etc. However the application of such a system requires a lot of training
and continual use to be a practical tool. Simple timing of the job will be
adequate provided you are aware of the good application of effective
worker movements and the undesirable in-effective worker movements.
Example:-
Time the operation in seconds and then apply the following
calculation -
|
| Cycle time |
8.00 |
Seconds / piece |
|
| Cycle time |
0.1333 |
Minutes / piece |
(8.00 / 60) |
| Available run time * |
400.00 |
Minutes / shift |
(480 - 10) x 85% uptime |
| Pieces / shift |
3000.0 |
Pieces |
(400 / 0.1333) |
| Pieces / hour ** |
375.0 |
Pieces |
(3000 / 8.00 hours) |
| Hours / 1000 base |
2.667 |
HOURS /
1000 |
(1000 /
375.0) |
|
* Assuming an up-time of 85%
(this is a reasonable average but you may wish to adjust to suit your
operation)
** Assuming an 8.00 hour shift (standard 5 day working week)
This is
the base standard which does not include the time of the support people
such as setters and stock-keepers. To
account for these people we need to calculate one final item.
CALCULATION OF ADO
We have seen how to establish standards for Direct
Labour operations, however to establish the total standard we must
consider the Applied Direct Operators, the ADO's. ADO's are those people
who are directly related to supporting the production effort. The specific
tasks that fall into this category are stock-keepers, setters, line
inspectors and process attendants. Note, setter-operators are normally considered to
be directs while supporting trades people would be included in departmental
burden (overhead).
There are several methods employed to cover the ADO
in the standard. One method is by direct study in the same way as direct
labour is studied. This permits standards to be applied to individual
jobs. Another approach is to apply Activity Sampling. While yet
another simple method is as follows: -
Each department is considered as a separate unit.
The number of ADO's required to support the direct
labour in the department is determined and the ratio of one to the other
is established.
Example:-
Department A has 50 direct operators and requires 5 ADO's.
The ratio would therefore be 50 : 5 or
10 : 1.
(Note, the ratio could be slightly different if any ADO's have to work
extra hours outside the normal 8 hour shift
e.g. clean-out equipment at end of shift
)
This ratio is then applied to the direct labour standard ( base standard ),
so if we had a base standard of 100 hours / 1,000, the ADO standard
would be 100 x 10% = 10 hours.
To confirm how this works, consider one shift of 8 hours production in dep't A.
Assume there are 50 people each working for 8 hours = 400 labour
hours/shift.
Assuming a base standard for job "X" of 100 hours / 1,000 parts,
the "direct" people would produce 4,000 parts at 100%
efficiency.
The ADO standard, at a 10:1 ratio, would be 10 hours / 1,000 hence as
4,000 parts have been made, 40 ADO standard hours will have been
generated. i.e. 10 x (4000
¸
1000 )
To check that this 40 hours supports the number of
ADO's in the department 40 ¸
8 = 5 ADO's which is the number we have in the department.
Under this method if the direct labour operation
achieves 90% efficiency the ADO generated standard is also down-rated
to 90% hence the measurement of their effort is linked to the direct
labour performance.
Final calculation of the Standard would be: -
|
| Cycle time |
8.00 |
Seconds / piece |
|
| Cycle time |
0.1333 |
Minutes / piece |
(8.00 / 60) |
| Available run time |
400.00 |
Minutes / shift |
(480 - 10) x 85% uptime |
| Pieces / shift |
3000.0 |
Pieces |
(400 / 0.1333) |
| Pieces / hour |
375.0 |
Pieces |
(3000 / 8.00 hours) |
| Hours / 1000 base |
2.667 |
Hours / 1000 |
(1000 /
375.0) |
| Hours / 1000 ALL-UP *** |
2.934 |
HOURS / 1000 |
(2.667 x 1.10) |
| ***
Assuming we use the 10% ADO allowance of the above ADO explanation.
Click
here for a copy of a Delay Study Form
|
| DEPARTMENT EFFICIENCY
Once we have established a standard for each part being made in the
department, it is a simple matter to measure the efficiency of our
efforts. The departmental efficiency calculation is normally based
upon comparing the hours that we should have taken to make a quantity of
parts (generated standard hours) against the number of hours we actually
took (actual clocked hours). For example:- |
| Part Description |
Quantity Produced |
Std Hours/1,000 |
Generated Standard Hours |
| Job A |
5,000 |
10.000 |
50.00 standard hours |
| Job B |
2,100 |
12.000 |
25.20 standard hours |
| Job C |
800 |
16.000 |
12.80 standard hours |
| Total |
7,900 |
|
88.00 standard hours |
| To make the above parts, 12 people each working an 8 hour
shift were needed. Their total actual clocked hours were 12 x 8 = 96
hours. Therefore the efficiency was 88.00 / 96.00 = 91.7%.
This efficiency measure is not solely a measure of how hard we worked as
there are many factors that can influence the figure, such as:-
Delay in receiving raw materials; Scrap generation caused by poor
material or poor process; machine breakdown; quantities of work
incorrectly recorded; production schedule insufficient to support the
number of people in the department; too few people in the department to
make what was required; lack of work containers; incorrect manning of
constraint operations. The list is endless. If you are having
problems in a particular department you need to:- detail the problems, the
time of each delay and the number of people effected. You can either
make a note when significant delays occur, or conduct a detailed delay
study or use activity sampling. Activity sampling is a form of
randomly spot checking individual operations throughout the shift to see
what is happening. The results are then collated to form an overall
picture of how the department is performing and to indicate where problems
exist. |
|